Alaska's own Gunakadeit joseeae by the amazing Gabriel Ugueto, or @SerpenIllus on the Twitters. |
A very long time ago, I posted an essay about one of my
favorite groups of Triassic marine reptiles: thalattosaurs. These lizard-shaped
swimmers, while generally similar in body form, differ from one another quite
strongly in terms of feeding adaptations. While Anshunsaurus and Askeptosaurus
may seem, to our modern eyes, rather vanilla in their clearly faunivorous
dentition, others strain credulity. Xinpusaurus,
for example, possesses a bizarre notched upper jaw and, in some specimens, an
elongate premaxillary spear which overshoots the the lower jaw by
an impressive degree, calling to mind swordfish and swordfish-snouted
ichthyosaurs. Thalattosaurus and its
“claraziid” brethren have reduced, shell-crushing dentition and snouts which
curve downward—Hescheleria takes this
trend to a puzzling extreme. Thalattosaurs also occupied a wide range of body
lengths (1-5 meters). While some were more terrestrially capable than others,
the group never seemed to stray far from the nearshore niche.
In that post, I mention that thalattosaurs are found around
the Northern Hemisphere, including one unpublished Alaskan taxon. I was lucky
enough to see this fossil several years ago at the University of Fairbanks’
Museum of the North (many thanks, once again, to Dr. Patrick Druckenmiller for
showing me and my wife around that wonderful place). It’s a beautiful specimen that I have a rather bad picture of on my phone, obscured by my own
reflection on its glass enclosure.
At the time, I thought it looked a bit like Xinpusaurus or Endennasaurus, what with the needle-nosed rostrum, but the
dentition was very different. Where Xinpusaurus
has heterodont dentition of various sizes and shapes, and Edennasaurus lacks teeth altogether, this unnamed band member had sharp, needle-like teeth to match its needle-nose snout.
I eagerly awaited the little guy’s eventual publication, and
that day came earlier this week.
Say hello to Gunakadeit
joseeae (Druckenmiller et al. 2020)!
UAMES 23258 |
Continuing the proud tradition of naming Alaska’s prehistoric
fauna after Native Alaskan creatures (Nanuqsaurus,
Ugrunaaluk), Gunakadeit (pronounced “Goo-na’-ka-date”) was named after a Tlingit
sea monster who brought good luck to those who saw it. The holotype, UAMES
23258, is nearly complete, lacking only the distal two-thirds of the tail and
the hands. It was found in Southeast Alaska on one of the Keku Islands. It is
of Norian age, so Gunakadeit is one
of the youngest thalattosaurs on record along with Italy’s Endennasaurus.
With an estimated length of between 75-90 centimeters, that
puts our boy at just under a yard long, toward the shorter end of the
thalattosaur scale. Among other things, Gunakadeit
is unique in having an extremely short post-orbital skull region, toothless
anterior snout and needle nose, short neck, and upper temporal fenestrae—which
were lost in other thalattosaurs (due to radically reducing the size of their
squamosal and postorbital bones). The authors revised and added to the character list of Li et al. (2016), then ran Gunakadeit through the analysis.
Surprisingly, it’s nowhere near Endennasaurus
or Xinpusaurus, instead occupying an
extremely basal position among thalattosaurs generally, but thalattosauroids
specifically, branching off prior to the weird-snouted taxa. This is even stranger
considering it’s one of the only surviving Norian members of the group, which
opens up a 20 million year ghost lineage between it and the earliest known
Ansian thalattosaurs.
A new phylogeny of thalattosaurs, from Druckenmiller et al. (2020). |
The authors suggest that Gunakadeit
went after soft-bodied prey either in open water or by probing in cavities and
crevices with its forceps-like jaws. The little guy’s depositional
environment—a volcanic island surrounded by coral reefs—indirectly supports
this assessment. Aside from the lack of teeth, Edennasaurus differs in one other important way from Gunakadeit: it was probably capable of
walking around on land when the mood struck it. This is probably not the case
with Gunakadeit, who had
poorly-ossified wrists and ankles, flattened forelimb bones, short limbs
generally, and an awkwardly-shaped tail for landlubbing. It's also interesting that the youngest surviving thalattosaurs are superficial similarities in terms of their feeding apparatuses, and may indicate that the
rest of their snouter cousins were outcompeted by other marine animals. And,
indeed, thalattosaurs do not appear to have survived through the Norian.
Always exciting when a new Mesozoic taxon from Alaska is published, and this is no exception. But also, thalattosaurs are awesome.
Small and apparently basal - it's phylogenetic position isn't by any chance getting skewed by immaturity?
ReplyDeleteAh good question; not sure. However, I will say that the snout and teeth are quite different from its closest relatives. Additionally, if Anshunsaurus is any guide, thalattosaurs didn't change much as they grew.
Delete