|
North America during the Campanian |
The title is a joke. Finding ceratopsian remains east of
Texas is an incredibly recent phenomenon. Oh sure, there are plenty of
(fragmentary) dinosaurs known from the eastern half of the United States, but
those taxa tend to be tyrannosauroids, nodosaurs, ornithomimids, and
hadrosaurs. I should mention at this point that, during much of the Late
Cretaceous, North America was cleaved into three islands by the presence of a
shallow interior sea called the Western Interior Seaway (WIS): Laramidia to the
west, Nunavut to the north, and Appalachia to the east. Laramidia’s eastern
north-south shoreline is where we get most of North America’s
dinosaurs—Alberta, Montana, Utah, and (to a lesser extent) Texas are all
hotbeds of dinosaur action, and that includes ceratopsians.
Appalachian dinosaurs differ sufficiently from their
Laramidian cousins to imply a lengthy period of isolation—all of Appalachia’s
dinosaurs must have migrated over there prior to the appearance of the WIS.
Once the WIS receded at the end of the Campanian (it was gone completely by the
Maastrichtian), dinosaurs from Laramidia and Appalachia were free to
comingle—if they did at all, but poor sampling in the eastern United States
(there’s a paucity of Late Cretaceous exposures) is an omnipresent frustration.
|
The North Carolina ceratopsian |
Anyway, in 2016, Longrich published on a
partial ceratopsianmaxilla from North Carolina (paywalled). It is very small and there aren’t any teeth in it,
but Longrich ascribes it to the Leptoceratopsidae. However, Andy Farke has told me it could also simply be from a basal neoceratopsians like
Aquilops. To me, this diagnosis is the safer bet.
Saying it’s a leptoceratopsid demands that leptoceratopsids evolved prior to
the appearance of the WIS and that they migrated not just from Asia to North
America but from Asia to
Eastern
North America by the Campanian. Given that the rest of Appalachia’s dinosaurs
are seemingly from more plesiomorphic stock than their Laramidian counterparts,
it makes more sense to—at this juncture—call it a basal neoceratopsian and
leave it at that.
|
The Mississippi ceratopsid tooth |
Today, we got another Appalachian ceratopsian from
Farke& Phillips (2017). This time, it’s a late Maastrichtian specimen from
Mississippi. The downside is that the specimen is a single tooth. Thankfully,
ceratopsian teeth are quite distinct, and the authors are able to show that it
is more derived than the teeth you find in
Zuniceratops
or
Turanoceratops. However, because
chasmosaurines and centrosaurines did not differ in terms of teeth, that’s as
far as they can classify it (Ceratopsidae).
This Mississippian ceratopsid is found in rocks deposited
after the WIS began to retreat, so it may represent an early dispersal of
Laramidian dinosaurs into Appalachia. Is there a reason it couldn’t represent a
relict ceratopsid, marooned in Appalachia after the WIS cut the country in two?
In fact, there is! The earliest ceratopsid fossils—guys like
Diabloceratops and
Albertaceratops—turn up after the WIS had already separated
Laramidia from Appalachia. So unless some plucky ceratopsid swam across a
surprisingly wide body of seawater (unlikely considering ceratopsids
didn’t do well when submerged), the Mississippi ceratopsid must have been a western
immigrant.
I would have to agree that the Late Cretaceous ceratopsian remains from Appalachia could be descended from leptoceratopsids and ceratopsoids that immigrated from Laramdia about 100 million years ago because the pre-Turonian fossil record of North American ceratopsians is poor (Aquilops is the only mid-Cretaceous horned dinosaur from Laramidia) and the early evolutionary history of Neoceratopsia is complex.
ReplyDeleteLooking at the map, I'm struck by the enormous amount of extra land area left by the retreat of the WIS. Do we know if that had an climatic effects?
ReplyDeleteNo idea, but you'd think so!
Delete